Learning styles vs. virtual education preferences: a cross-sectional study on medical sciences e-students
Zahra Karimian; Zahra Zolfaghari · 2024 · Frontiers in Education
WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate
The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.
Abstract
E-students sometimes feel isolated due to the lack of face-to-face communication with teachers. It is important to pay attention to students’ learning styles and the virtual education methods used by teachers. This study aimed to investigate the preferences of students at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS) regarding virtual education and their learning styles. A descriptive survey research was conducted on postgraduate e-students in 2019-2020. A stratified random sampling was performed among 300 students from four virtual master’s programs at SUMS. A total of 180 questionnaires were
Abstract by Zahra Karimian; Zahra Zolfaghari, Frontiers in Education (2024) — licensed CC BY 4.0.
About to run something similar?
Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.
Related failures
Understanding the adoption of educational AI tools in Sub-Saharan African higher education: a theory of planned behaviour-based analysis
Negative / Null Result ReportEnhancing mathematical communication and Islamic values in Islamic and regular schools through interactive worksheets
Negative / Null Result ReportPengaruh Metode Pembelajaran dan Tipe Kepribadian Terhadap Hasil Belajar Bahasa Arab (Studi Eksperimen Pada MAN 1 Semarang)
Negative / Null Result ReportTHE EFFECTIVENESS OF LANGUAGE PROGRAM TOWARDS STUDENTS SPEAKING SKILL IN UNIVERSITY
Negative / Null Result ReportExamination of medical students’ opinions on multimedia learning materials according to social cues: focusing on sound principles
Negative / Null Result ReportImmersive poetry learning: a field study with middle school students
WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.
Metadata source: DOAJ · DOI 10.3389/feduc.2024.1499501