e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessDiseases of the genitourinary system. Urology

Concerns about stone free rate and procedure events of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) for 2–4 cm kidney stones by standard-PCNL vs mini-PCNL- comparative randomised study

Mohamed Wishahi; Ahmed El Feel; Amr Elkhouly; Abdullah Fahmy; Mamdouh Roshdy; Ahmed G Elbaz; Ahmed I Kamel; Mohamed Badawy · 2023 · BMC Urology

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

The finding, in one line

Results Both groups showed no significant difference in clinical data about age, stone location, back pressure changes, and body mass index.

Abstract

Abstract Background To compare the efficacy and safety of standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) with mini- PCNL for kidney stones 2–4 cm. Methods Eighty patients were enrolled in a comparative study, they were randomly divided into mini-PCNL group (n = 40) and standard-PCNL (n = 40). Demographic characteristics, perioperative events, complications, stone free rate (SFR) were reported. Results Both groups showed no significant difference in clinical data about age, stone location, back pressure changes, and body mass index. The mean operative time was (95 ± 17.9 min) in mini-PCNL, and (7

Abstract by Mohamed Wishahi; Ahmed El Feel; Amr Elkhouly; Abdullah Fahmy; Mamdouh Roshdy; Ahmed G Elbaz; Ahmed I Kamel; Mohamed Badawy, BMC Urology (2023) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: DOAJ · DOI 10.1186/s12894-023-01270-1