e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessComputer Science· cited by 9

Comparative analysis of supervised and self-supervised learning with small and imbalanced medical imaging datasets

Andrea Espis; Chiara Marzi; Stefano Diciotti · 2025 · Scientific Reports

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

Abstract

Self-supervised learning (SSL) in computer vision has shown its potential to reduce reliance on labeled data. However, most studies focused on balanced, large, broad-domain datasets like ImageNet, whereas, in real-world medical applications, dataset size is typically limited. This study compares the performance of SSL versus supervised learning (SL) on small, imbalanced medical imaging datasets. We experimented with four binary classification tasks: age prediction and diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease from brain magnetic resonance imaging scans, pneumonia from chest radiograms, and retinal dise

Abstract by Andrea Espis; Chiara Marzi; Stefano Diciotti, Scientific Reports (2025) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1038/s41598-025-99000-0