e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessComputer Science· cited by 279

The impact of site-specific digital histology signatures on deep learning model accuracy and bias

Frederick M. Howard; James M. Dolezal; Sara Kochanny; Jefree J. Schulte; Heather Chen; Lara R. Heij; Dezheng Huo; Rita Nanda · 2021 · Nature Communications

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

Abstract

The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) is one of the largest biorepositories of digital histology. Deep learning (DL) models have been trained on TCGA to predict numerous features directly from histology, including survival, gene expression patterns, and driver mutations. However, we demonstrate that these features vary substantially across tissue submitting sites in TCGA for over 3,000 patients with six cancer subtypes. Additionally, we show that histologic image differences between submitting sites can easily be identified with DL. Site detection remains possible despite commonly used color normaliz

Abstract by Frederick M. Howard; James M. Dolezal; Sara Kochanny; Jefree J. Schulte; Heather Chen; Lara R. Heij; Dezheng Huo; Rita Nanda, Nature Communications (2021) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-24698-1