e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessScience

Does competitive winning increase subsequent cheating?

Andrew M. Colman; Briony D. Pulford; Caren A. Frosch; Marta Mangiarulo; Jeremy N. V. Miles · 2022 · Royal Society Open Science

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

Abstract

In this preregistered study, we attempted to replicate and substantially extend a frequently cited experiment by Schurr and Ritov, published in 2016, suggesting that winners of pairwise competitions are more likely than others to steal money in subsequent games of chance against different opponents, possibly because of an enhanced sense of entitlement among competition winners. A replication seemed desirable because of the relevance of the effect to dishonesty in everyday life, the apparent counterintuitivity of the effect, possible problems and anomalies in the original study, and above all t

Abstract by Andrew M. Colman; Briony D. Pulford; Caren A. Frosch; Marta Mangiarulo; Jeremy N. V. Miles, Royal Society Open Science (2022) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: DOAJ · DOI 10.1098/rsos.202197