e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessPsychology· cited by 14

Effectiveness and moderators of individual cognitive behavioral therapy versus treatment as usual in clinically depressed adolescents: a randomized controlled trial

Yvonne Stikkelbroek; Gerko Vink; Maaike H. Nauta; Marco Bottelier; Leonieke Vet; Cathelijne M. Lont; Anneloes L. van Baar; Denise Bodden · 2020 · Scientific Reports

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

Abstract

We examined if manualized cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) was more effective than Treatment As Usual (TAU) for clinically depressed adolescents within routine care. This multisite Randomized controlled trail included 88 clinically depressed adolescents (aged 12-21 years) randomly assigned to CBT or TAU. Multiple assessments (pre-, post treatment and six-month follow-up) were done using semi-structured interviews, questionnaires and ratings and multiple informants. The primary outcome was depressive or dysthymic disorder based on the KSADS. Completers, CBT (n = 19) and TAU (n = 26), showed a

Abstract by Yvonne Stikkelbroek; Gerko Vink; Maaike H. Nauta; Marco Bottelier; Leonieke Vet; Cathelijne M. Lont; Anneloes L. van Baar; Denise Bodden, Scientific Reports (2020) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-71160-1