e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology· cited by 12

When to Trust Epigenetic Clocks: Avoiding False Positives in Aging Interventions

Daniel S. Borrus; Raghav Sehgal; Judith Armstrong; Jessica Kasamoto; John T. González; Albert Higgins‐Chen · 2026 · Aging Cell

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Epigenetic clocks have emerged as potential biomarkers of aging due to their association with morbidity and mortality. They have recently gained traction as outcome measurements for anti‐aging interventions. However, as the number of new epigenetic clocks continues to grow, different clocks may not agree on the effect of an intervention. This raises the question of when researchers can trust epigenetic clock results. In this study, we find that when extending previously published single‐clock intervention studies to include additional clock models, no additional clocks reach statistic

Abstract by Daniel S. Borrus; Raghav Sehgal; Judith Armstrong; Jessica Kasamoto; John T. González; Albert Higgins‐Chen, Aging Cell (2026) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1111/acel.70756