e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessBusiness, Management and Accounting· cited by 13

Measuring Self-Preferencing on Digital Platforms

Lukas Jürgensmeier; Bernd Skiera · 2025 · Journal of Marketing

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

Abstract

Digital platforms facilitate exchanges between platform actors, such as trading between buyers and sellers. However, providers of digital platforms also compete with other actors, referred to as third parties, on their own platforms. In such settings, self-preferencing can occur if the platform treats its own offerings better than comparable third-party offerings—a practice often deemed inappropriate. However, detecting self-preferencing is challenging. This article addresses this challenge conceptually and empirically by putting forward a conceptual framework that defines self-preferencing an

Abstract by Lukas Jürgensmeier; Bernd Skiera, Journal of Marketing (2025) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1177/00222429251360772