Open innovation: Are inbound and outbound knowledge flows really complementary?
Bruno Cassiman; Giovanni Valentini · 2015 · Strategic Management Journal
WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate
The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.
Abstract (excerpt)
One novel implication of the open innovation paradigm is that inflows and outflows of knowledge are complementary. We argue that engaging simultaneously in buying and selling knowledge should allow firms to increase innovation outcomes. At…
Excerpt shown for reference under fair use — read the full paper at the publisher.
Hosted by the publisher — may require access.
About to run something similar?
Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.
Related failures
The influence of relational competencies on supply chain resilience: a relational view
Negative / Null Result ReportJob satisfaction and organizational commitment effect in the transformational leadership towards employee performance
Negative / Null Result ReportDynamic capabilities and their indirect impact on firm performance
Negative / Null Result ReportDo Socially Responsible Firms Pay More Taxes?
Negative / Null Result ReportThe Janus face of artificial intelligence feedback: Deployment versus disclosure effects on employee performance
Negative / Null Result ReportPine and Gilmore's Concept of Experience Economy and Its Dimensions: An Empirical Examination in Tourism
WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.
Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1002/smj.2375