e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessScience

Eleven years of student replication projects provide evidence on the correlates of replicability in psychology

Veronica Boyce; Maya Mathur; Michael C. Frank · 2023 · Royal Society Open Science

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

The finding, in one line

Yet in psychology, some prominent findings have failed to replicate, and large-scale studies suggest replicability issues are widespread.

Abstract

Cumulative scientific progress requires empirical results that are robust enough to support theory construction and extension. Yet in psychology, some prominent findings have failed to replicate, and large-scale studies suggest replicability issues are widespread. The identification of predictors of replication success is limited by the difficulty of conducting large samples of independent replication experiments, however: most investigations reanalyse the same set of [Formula: see text]. We introduce a new dataset of 176 replications from students in a graduate-level methods course. Replicati

Abstract by Veronica Boyce; Maya Mathur; Michael C. Frank, Royal Society Open Science (2023) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: DOAJ · DOI 10.1098/rsos.231240