e-ISSN: Pending
Methods Dead-EndOpen accessPsychology· cited by 69

Estimation of minimal data sets sizes for machine learning predictions in digital mental health interventions

Kirsten Zantvoort; Barbara Nacke; Dennis Görlich; Silvan Hornstein; Corinna Jacobi; Burkhardt Funk · 2024 · npj Digital Medicine

WASTE classifies this as Methods Dead-End · AI classification, approximate

A method or design hit a limitation — check whether the same constraint applies to your setup.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence promises to revolutionize mental health care, but small dataset sizes and lack of robust methods raise concerns about result generalizability. To provide insights on minimal necessary data set sizes, we explore domain-specific learning curves for digital intervention dropout predictions based on 3654 users from a single study (ISRCTN13716228, 26/02/2016). Prediction performance is analyzed based on dataset size (N = 100-3654), feature groups (F = 2-129), and algorithm choice (from Naive Bayes to Neural Networks). The results substantiate the concern that small datasets

Abstract by Kirsten Zantvoort; Barbara Nacke; Dennis Görlich; Silvan Hornstein; Corinna Jacobi; Burkhardt Funk, npj Digital Medicine (2024) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1038/s41746-024-01360-w