e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessDentistry

Sealing ability of a new calcium silicate based material as a dentin substitute in class II sandwich restorations: An in vitro study

Raji Viola Solomon; Parupalli Karunakar; Deepthi Sarvani Grandhala; Chaitanya Byragoni · 2014 · Journal of Oral Research and Review

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

Abstract

Background: Class ll sandwich restorations are routinely performed where conventional Glass ionomer cement (GIC) or Resin-modified GIC (RMGIC) is used as a base or dentin substitute and a light curing composite resin restorative material is used as an enamel substitute. Various authors have evaluated the microleakage of composite resin restorations where glass ionomer cement has been used as a base in class II sandwich restorations, but a literature survey reveals limited studies on the microleakage analysis of similar restorations with biodentine as a dentin substitute, as an alternative to g

Abstract by Raji Viola Solomon; Parupalli Karunakar; Deepthi Sarvani Grandhala; Chaitanya Byragoni, Journal of Oral Research and Review (2014) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: DOAJ · DOI 10.4103/2249-4987.140193