Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study
Mario Imburgia; Silvia Logozzo; Uli Hauschild; Giovanni Veronesi; Carlo Mangano; Francesco Mangano · 2017 · BMC Oral Health
WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate
The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Until now, only a few studies have compared the ability of different intraoral scanners (IOS) to capture high-quality impressions in patients with dental implants. Hence, the aim of this study was to compare the trueness and precision of four IOS in a partially edentulous model (PEM) with three implants and in a fully edentulous model (FEM) with six implants. METHODS: Two gypsum models were prepared with respectively three and six implant analogues, and polyether-ether-ketone cylinders screwed on. These models were scanned with a reference scanner (ScanRider®), and with four IOS (C
Abstract by Mario Imburgia; Silvia Logozzo; Uli Hauschild; Giovanni Veronesi; Carlo Mangano; Francesco Mangano, BMC Oral Health (2017) — licensed CC BY 4.0.
About to run something similar?
Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.
Related failures
Bioactivity evaluation of three calcium silicate‐based endodontic materials
Negative / Null Result ReportIncidence of impacted mandibular and maxillary third molars-a radiographic study in a Southeast Iran population
Negative / Null Result ReportAnti‐infective therapy of peri‐implantitis with adjunctive local drug delivery or photodynamic therapy: 12‐month outcomes of a randomized controlled clinical trial
Negative / Null Result ReportExploring the genetic basis of chronic periodontitis: a genome-wide association study
Negative / Null Result ReportIn Vitro Biofilm Formation on Titanium and Zirconia Implant Surfaces
Negative / Null Result ReportAnti‐infective therapy of peri‐implantitis with adjunctive local drug delivery or photodynamic therapy: six‐month outcomes of a prospective randomized clinical trial
WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.
Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1186/s12903-017-0383-4