e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessComputer Science· cited by 32

Intricacies of human–AI interaction in dynamic decision-making for precision oncology

Dipesh Niraula; Kyle C. Cuneo; Ivo D. Dinov; Brian D. Gonzalez; Jamalina Jamaluddin; Jionghua Jin; Yi Luo; M.M. Matuszak · 2025 · Nature Communications

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

Abstract

AI decision support systems can assist clinicians in planning adaptive treatment strategies that can dynamically react to individuals' cancer progression for effective personalized care. However, AI's imperfections can lead to suboptimal therapeutics if clinicians over or under rely on AI. To investigate such collaborative decision-making process, we conducted a Human-AI interaction study on response-adaptive radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma. We investigated two levels of collaborative behavior: model-agnostic and model-specific; and found that Human-AI

Abstract by Dipesh Niraula; Kyle C. Cuneo; Ivo D. Dinov; Brian D. Gonzalez; Jamalina Jamaluddin; Jionghua Jin; Yi Luo; M.M. Matuszak, Nature Communications (2025) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1038/s41467-024-55259-x