On the universality of aesthetic preference and inference: a cross-cultural (Chinese–German) study
Chantal A. Miller; Keshun Zhang; Ronald Hübner · 2025 · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate
The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.
Abstract
Abstract Aesthetic preferences vary widely among individuals and across cultures. These culture-specific aesthetic preferences are reflected in the environment, artistic behaviour, and consumer choices. People have the ability to infer the aesthetic preferences of others within their own culture through their Theory of Aesthetic Preferences , which is a subcategory of the Theory of Mind. An important question is whether people can also infer aesthetic preferences across different cultures. This study aimed to investigate aesthetic preference and aesthetic inference, as well as the underlying m
Abstract by Chantal A. Miller; Keshun Zhang; Ronald Hübner, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (2025) — licensed CC BY 4.0.
About to run something similar?
Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.
Related failures
Our Princess Is in Another Castle
Negative / Null Result ReportUsing Psychological Artificial Intelligence (Tess) to Relieve Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety: Randomized Controlled Trial
Negative / Null Result ReportHow Replicable Are Links Between Personality Traits and Consequential Life Outcomes? The Life Outcomes of Personality Replication Project
Negative / Null Result ReportThe cross-cultural validity of posttraumatic stress disorder: implications for DSM-5
Negative / Null Result ReportPsychiatric and medical correlates of DSM‐5 eating disorders in a nationally representative sample of adults in the United States
Negative / Null Result ReportRomantic relationships and the physical and mental health of college students
WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.
Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1057/s41599-025-04806-y