How to tell a happy person: Accuracy of subjective well-being perception from texts
Olga Stavrova; Lena Haarmann · 2019 · Motivation and Emotion
WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate
The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.
Abstract
Abstract Although perceptions of subjective well-being (SWB) in unacquainted others have been shown to play a major role in impression formation, little is known about how accurate such perceptions are. In two original studies and one pre-registered replication, we explored the accuracy of life satisfaction and happiness judgments from texts and its underlying mechanisms (use of linguistic cues). Participants filled in life satisfaction and happiness measures and completed a brief writing task. Another sample of participants judged the targets’ life satisfaction and happiness from the obtained
Abstract by Olga Stavrova; Lena Haarmann, Motivation and Emotion (2019) — licensed CC BY 4.0.
About to run something similar?
Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.
Related failures
Our Princess Is in Another Castle
Negative / Null Result ReportUsing Psychological Artificial Intelligence (Tess) to Relieve Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety: Randomized Controlled Trial
Negative / Null Result ReportHow Replicable Are Links Between Personality Traits and Consequential Life Outcomes? The Life Outcomes of Personality Replication Project
Negative / Null Result ReportThe cross-cultural validity of posttraumatic stress disorder: implications for DSM-5
Negative / Null Result ReportPsychiatric and medical correlates of DSM‐5 eating disorders in a nationally representative sample of adults in the United States
Negative / Null Result ReportRomantic relationships and the physical and mental health of college students
WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.
Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1007/s11031-019-09815-4