e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology· cited by 20

An unbiased comparison of 14 epigenetic clocks in relation to 174 incident disease outcomes

Christos Mavrommatis; Daniel W. Belsky; Kejun Ying; Mahdi Moqri; Archie Campbell; Anne Richmond; Vadim N. Gladyshev; Tamir Chandra · 2025 · Nature Communications

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

Abstract

Epigenetic Clocks have been trained to predict chronological age, healthspan and lifespan. Such clocks are often analysed in relation to disease outcomes - typically using small datasets and a limited number of clocks. Here, we present a large-scale (n = 18,859), unbiased comparison of 14 widely used clocks as predictors of 174 incident disease outcomes and all-cause mortality over 10-years of follow up. Second- and third-generation clocks significantly outperform first-generation clocks, which have limited applications in disease settings. Of the 176 Bonferroni significant (P 1%. However, the

Abstract by Christos Mavrommatis; Daniel W. Belsky; Kejun Ying; Mahdi Moqri; Archie Campbell; Anne Richmond; Vadim N. Gladyshev; Tamir Chandra, Nature Communications (2025) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1038/s41467-025-66106-y