e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessPsychology

Observed effects of distributional learning may not relate to the number of peaks. A test of dispersion as a confounding factor.

Karin eWanrooij; Paul eBoersma; Titia eBenders; Titia eBenders · 2015 · Frontiers in Psychology

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

Abstract

Distributional learning of speech sounds is learning from simply being exposed to frequency distributions of speech sounds in one’s surroundings. In laboratory settings, the mechanism has been reported to be discernible already after a few minutes of exposure, in both infants and adults. These effects of distributional training have traditionally been attributed to the difference in the number of peaks between the experimental distribution (two peaks) and the control distribution (one or zero peaks). However, none of the earlier studies fully excluded a possibly confounding effect of the dispe

Abstract by Karin eWanrooij; Paul eBoersma; Titia eBenders; Titia eBenders, Frontiers in Psychology (2015) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: DOAJ · DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01341