e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessPsychology· cited by 27

Test-retest reliability of a smartphone-based approach-avoidance task: Effects of retest period, stimulus type, and demographics

Hilmar Zech; Philip A. Gable; W. van Dijk; Lotte F. van Dillen · 2022 · Behavior Research Methods

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

The finding, in one line

Unfortunately, more recent AAT studies have failed to replicate earlier promising findings.

Abstract

The approach-avoidance task (AAT) is an implicit task that measures people's behavioral tendencies to approach or avoid stimuli in the environment. In recent years, it has been used successfully to help explain a variety of health problems (e.g., addictions and phobias). Unfortunately, more recent AAT studies have failed to replicate earlier promising findings. One explanation for these replication failures could be that the AAT does not reliably measure approach-avoidance tendencies. Here, we first review existing literature on the reliability of various versions of the AAT. Next, we examine

Abstract by Hilmar Zech; Philip A. Gable; W. van Dijk; Lotte F. van Dillen, Behavior Research Methods (2022) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.3758/s13428-022-01920-6