e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessNeuroscience· cited by 12

Higher visual areas act like domain-general filters with strong selectivity and functional specialization

Meenakshi Khosla; Leila Wehbe · 2026 · Nature Communications

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

Abstract

Neuroscientific studies rely heavily on a-priori hypotheses, which can bias results toward existing theories. Here, we use a hypothesis-neutral approach to study category selectivity in higher visual cortex. Using only stimulus images and their associated fMRI activity, we constrain randomly initialized neural networks to predict voxel activity. Despite no category-level supervision, units in the trained networks act as detectors for semantic concepts like 'faces' or 'words', providing solid empirical support for categorical selectivity. Importantly, this selectivity is mostly maintained when

Abstract by Meenakshi Khosla; Leila Wehbe, Nature Communications (2026) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1038/s41467-026-73938-9