Adaptive scaling of reward in episodic memory: a replication study
Alice Mason; Casimir J. H. Ludwig; Simon Farrell · 2016 · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate
The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.
Abstract
Reward is thought to enhance episodic memory formation via dopaminergic consolidation. Bunzeck, Dayan, Dolan, and Duzel [(2010). A common mechanism for adaptive scaling of reward and novelty. Human Brain Mapping, 31, 1380-1394] provided functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and behavioural evidence that reward and episodic memory systems are sensitive to the contextual value of a reward-whether it is relatively higher or lower-as opposed to absolute value or prediction error. We carried out a direct replication of their behavioural study and did not replicate their finding that memory p
Abstract by Alice Mason; Casimir J. H. Ludwig; Simon Farrell, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2016) — licensed CC BY 4.0.
About to run something similar?
Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.
Related failures
Reproducible brain-wide association studies require thousands of individuals
Negative / Null Result ReportDaily Left Prefrontal Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Therapy for Major Depressive Disorder
Negative / Null Result ReportEarly Brain Overgrowth in Autism Associated With an Increase in Cortical Surface Area Before Age 2 Years
Negative / Null Result ReportObjective evaluation of anosmia and ageusia in COVID‐19 patients: Single‐center experience on 72 cases
Negative / Null Result ReportPolarity and timing-dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in explicit motor learning
Negative / Null Result ReportThe feedback-related negativity (FRN) revisited: New insights into the localization, meaning and network organization
WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.
Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1080/17470218.2016.1233439