e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessEnvironmental Science· cited by 11

How well do process-based and data-driven hydrological models learn from limited discharge data?

Maria Staudinger; Anna Herzog; Ralf Loritz; Tobias Houska; Sandra Pool; Diana Spieler; Paul D. Wagner; Juliane Mai · 2025 · Hydrology and earth system sciences

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

Abstract

Abstract. It is widely assumed that data-driven models achieve good results only with sufficiently large training data, whereas process-based models are usually expected to be superior in data-poor situations. To investigate this, we calibrated several process-based and data-driven hydrological models using training datasets of observed discharge that differed in terms of both the number of data points and the type of data selection, allowing us to make a systematic comparison of the learning behaviour of the different model types. Four data-driven models (conditional probability distributions

Abstract by Maria Staudinger; Anna Herzog; Ralf Loritz; Tobias Houska; Sandra Pool; Diana Spieler; Paul D. Wagner; Juliane Mai, Hydrology and earth system sciences (2025) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.5194/hess-29-5005-2025