e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessMedicine

An analysis of the impact of the inclusion of expiration data on the fitting of a predictive pulmonary elastance model

Morton Sophie; Docherty Paul; Dickson Jennifer; Chase J. Geoffrey · 2018 · Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

Abstract

Mechanical ventilation is a primary therapy for patients with respiratory failure. However, incorrect ventilator settings can cause lung damage. Optimising ventilation while minimising risk is complex in practice. A common lung protective strategy is to titrate positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to the point of minimum elastance. This process can result in additional available lung volume due to alveolar recruitment but comes with the risk of subjecting the lungs to excessive pressure and lung damage. Predictive elastance models can mitigate this risk by estimating airway pressure at a hi

Abstract by Morton Sophie; Docherty Paul; Dickson Jennifer; Chase J. Geoffrey, Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering (2018) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: DOAJ · DOI 10.1515/cdbme-2018-0062