e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessMedicine· cited by 13

Optimal medical care and coronary flow capacity-guided myocardial revascularization vs usual care for chronic coronary artery disease: the CENTURY trial

K. Lance Gould; Nils P. Johnson; Amanda E. Roby; Richard L. Kirkeeide; Mary Haynie; Tung Nguyen; Linh Bui; Monica Patel · 2025 · European Heart Journal

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The randomized CENTURY trial tested the hypothesis that a comprehensive strategy integrating intense lifestyle modification and aggressive medical management to goals with revascularization reserved for severely reduced coronary flow capacity (CFC) by positron emission tomography (PET) would reduce risk factors, subsequent revascularization, death and myocardial infarction (MI) compared with standard of care in chronic stable coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: Participants were randomly assigned to standard or comprehensive care groups. Rest-stress PET quantified CFC

Abstract by K. Lance Gould; Nils P. Johnson; Amanda E. Roby; Richard L. Kirkeeide; Mary Haynie; Tung Nguyen; Linh Bui; Monica Patel, European Heart Journal (2025) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf356