e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessNeuroscience· cited by 47

No Evidence for an Object Working Memory Capacity Benefit with Extended Viewing Time

Colin Quirk; Kirsten Adam; Edward K. Vogel · 2020 · eNeuro

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

Abstract

Visual working memory is the ability to hold visual information temporarily in mind. A key feature of working memory is its starkly limited capacity, such that only a few simple items can be remembered at once. Prior work has shown that this capacity limit cannot be circumvented by providing additional encoding time, whether providing just 200 ms or up to 1300 ms, capacity is still limited to only three to four items. In contrast, Brady et al. (2016) hypothesized that real-world objects, but not simple items used in prior research, benefit from additional encoding time and are not subject to t

Abstract by Colin Quirk; Kirsten Adam; Edward K. Vogel, eNeuro (2020) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1523/eneuro.0150-20.2020