e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessMedicine· cited by 42

An optimised patient information sheet did not significantly increase recruitment or retention in a falls prevention study: an embedded randomised recruitment trial

Sarah Cockayne; Caroline Fairhurst; Joy Adamson; Catherine Hewitt; Robin Hull; Kate Hicks; A.-M. Keenan; Sarah E Lamb · 2017 · Trials

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Randomised controlled trials are generally regarded as the 'gold standard' experimental design to determine the effectiveness of an intervention. Unfortunately, many trials either fail to recruit sufficient numbers of participants, or recruitment takes longer than anticipated. The current embedded trial evaluates the effectiveness of optimised patient information sheets on recruitment of participants in a falls prevention trial. METHODS: A three-arm, embedded randomised methodology trial was conducted within the National Institute for Health Research-funded REducing Falls with ORth

Abstract by Sarah Cockayne; Caroline Fairhurst; Joy Adamson; Catherine Hewitt; Robin Hull; Kate Hicks; A.-M. Keenan; Sarah E Lamb, Trials (2017) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1186/s13063-017-1797-7