e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessNeuroscience· cited by 303

Different scaling of linear models and deep learning in UKBiobank brain images versus machine-learning datasets

Marc-André Schulz; B.T. Thomas Yeo; Joshua T Vogelstein; Janaina Mourao-Miranada; Jakob Nikolas Kather; Konrad P. Körding; Blake A. Richards; Danilo Bzdok · 2020 · Nature Communications

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

Abstract

Recently, deep learning has unlocked unprecedented success in various domains, especially using images, text, and speech. However, deep learning is only beneficial if the data have nonlinear relationships and if they are exploitable at available sample sizes. We systematically profiled the performance of deep, kernel, and linear models as a function of sample size on UKBiobank brain images against established machine learning references. On MNIST and Zalando Fashion, prediction accuracy consistently improves when escalating from linear models to shallow-nonlinear models, and further improves w

Abstract by Marc-André Schulz; B.T. Thomas Yeo; Joshua T Vogelstein; Janaina Mourao-Miranada; Jakob Nikolas Kather; Konrad P. Körding; Blake A. Richards; Danilo Bzdok, Nature Communications (2020) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-18037-z