Risks of Propofol-based Total Intravenous Anesthesia Compared with Local Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty in The Lower Extremity
Wejpisit Wongwiwattananon; Jatuporn Pakpirom; Raviwan Akarapatima · 2020 · Journal of Health Science and Medical Research (JHSMR)
WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate
The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to determine the risks of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) compared to local anesthesia (LA) in patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in a lower extremity. Material and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in 231 patients who underwent PTA in the lower extremity using either propofol-based TIVA or LA between January 2016 and September 2018. The outcomes of interest included perioperative major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and minor perioperative complications. Risk factors analysis was performed using a uni
Abstract by Wejpisit Wongwiwattananon; Jatuporn Pakpirom; Raviwan Akarapatima, Journal of Health Science and Medical Research (JHSMR) (2020) — licensed CC BY 4.0.
About to run something similar?
Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.
Related failures
A Randomized Trial of Intraarterial Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Negative / Null Result ReportDuodenal Infusion of Donor Feces for Recurrent Clostridium difficile
Negative / Null Result ReportStenting versus Endarterectomy for Treatment of Carotid-Artery Stenosis
Negative / Null Result ReportEffects of Combination Lipid Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Replication FailureA Randomized Trial of Bevacizumab for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma
Negative / Null Result ReportSpironolactone for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.
Metadata source: DOAJ · DOI 10.31584/jhsmr.2020747