e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessMedicine· cited by 11

Multicenter Prospective Validation of an Updated Proprietary Sepsis Prediction Model

Andrew Wong; Danielle Currey; Megan Schwinne; Brenna Park-Egan; Sean R. Meyer; Andrew A. Gutting; Jie Cao; Sharaf Khan · 2026 · JAMA Network Open

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

Abstract

Importance: The Epic Sepsis Model version 2 (ESM v2) is a widely implemented proprietary sepsis prediction model, but no multicenter, external validation of its performance has been reported to guide adoption and use. Objective: To conduct a multicenter validation of the ESM v2 to compare performance against the original ESM v1, outline differences across heterogenous clinical sites, and compare model performance against clinician recognition of sepsis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prognostic study included adult inpatient encounters at 4 large US health systems between August 31, 2

Abstract by Andrew Wong; Danielle Currey; Megan Schwinne; Brenna Park-Egan; Sean R. Meyer; Andrew A. Gutting; Jie Cao; Sharaf Khan, JAMA Network Open (2026) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.0181