Accounting for spatiality of renewables and storage in transmission planning
Leonard Göke; Mario Kendziorski; Claudia Kemfert; Christian von Hirschhausen · 2021 · arXiv
WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate
The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.
Abstract (excerpt)
The current governance process to plan the German energy system omits two options to substitute grid expansion: First, placing renewables closer to demand instead of where site conditions are best. Second, utilizing storage instead of additional transmission infrastructure to prevent grid congestion. In the paper, we apply a comprehensive capacity expansion model based on the AnyMOD modelling framework to compare the status quo to alternative planning approaches for a fully renewable energy system. To represent spatiality and fluctuations of renewables, the German electricity sector is modelle
Excerpt shown for reference under fair use — read the full paper at the publisher.
About to run something similar?
Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.
Related failures
Resonant amplitude distribution of the Hilda asteroids and the free-floating planet flyby scenario
Negative / Null Result Report3D Simulations of Plasma Filaments in the Scrape Off Layer: A Comparison with Models of Reduced Dimensionality
Negative / Null Result ReportHerd Behaviour in Public Goods Games
Negative / Null Result ReportAccurate coarse-graining of small organic molecules in melts and thin films using density-dependent potentials
Negative / Null Result ReportSemi-Analytical Models for Lensing by Dark Halos: I. Splitting Angles
Negative / Null Result ReportSimulated Annealing with Tsallis Weights - A Numerical Comparison
WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.
Metadata source: arXiv