e-ISSN: Pending
Replication FailureOpen accessDecision Sciences· cited by 349

Data availability, reusability, and analytic reproducibility: evaluating the impact of a mandatory open data policy at the journal Cognition

Tom E Hardwicke; Maya B. Mathur; Kyle MacDonald; Gustav Nilsonne; George C. Banks; Mallory C. Kidwell; Alicia Hofelich Mohr; Elizabeth Clayton · 2018 · Royal Society Open Science

WASTE classifies this as Replication Failure · AI classification, approximate

A previously reported effect did not replicate here — verify it holds before you build on it.

Abstract

Access to data is a critical feature of an efficient, progressive and ultimately self-correcting scientific ecosystem. But the extent to which in-principle benefits of data sharing are realized in practice is unclear. Crucially, it is largely unknown whether published findings can be reproduced by repeating reported analyses upon shared data (‘analytic reproducibility’). To investigate this, we conducted an observational evaluation of a mandatory open data policy introduced at the journal Cognition . Interrupted time-series analyses indicated a substantial post-policy increase in data availabl

Abstract by Tom E Hardwicke; Maya B. Mathur; Kyle MacDonald; Gustav Nilsonne; George C. Banks; Mallory C. Kidwell; Alicia Hofelich Mohr; Elizabeth Clayton, Royal Society Open Science (2018) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1098/rsos.180448