Well-being Index Scores and Subjective Health Status of Korean Healthcare Workers
Yoonhee Shin; Bohyun Park; Nam-eun Kim; Eun Jeong Choi; Minsu Ock; Sun Ha Jee; Sue K. Park; Hyeong Sik Ahn · 2022 · Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate
The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.
Abstract
Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the subjective level of health-related quality of life of Korean healthcare workers using various quality-of-life instruments. Methods This study included 992 participants, who were doctors and nurses. A survey was conducted between November 28 and December 4, 2019. Data from 954 participants divided into 3 groups (physicians, residents, and nurses) were analyzed. Four measurement tools (29 questions) were used in the survey to evaluate subjective health status and well-being. Results In the Mayo Well-being Index, burnout during work (88.5%) and
Abstract by Yoonhee Shin; Bohyun Park; Nam-eun Kim; Eun Jeong Choi; Minsu Ock; Sun Ha Jee; Sue K. Park; Hyeong Sik Ahn, Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health (2022) — licensed CC BY 4.0.
About to run something similar?
Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.
Related failures
A Randomized Trial of Intraarterial Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Negative / Null Result ReportDuodenal Infusion of Donor Feces for Recurrent Clostridium difficile
Negative / Null Result ReportStenting versus Endarterectomy for Treatment of Carotid-Artery Stenosis
Negative / Null Result ReportEffects of Combination Lipid Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Replication FailureA Randomized Trial of Bevacizumab for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma
Negative / Null Result ReportSpironolactone for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.
Metadata source: DOAJ · DOI 10.3961/jpmph.22.114