e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessPhysics and Astronomy· cited by 10

The Velocity Field Olympics: assessing velocity field reconstructions with direct distance tracers

Richard Stiskalek; Harry Desmond; Julien Devriendt; Adrianne D. Slyz; Guilhem Lavaux; Michael James Hudson; Deaglan J. Bartlett; Hélène M. Courtois · 2025 · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

Abstract

ABSTRACT The peculiar velocity field of the local Universe provides direct insights into its matter distribution and the underlying theory of gravity, and is essential in cosmological analyses for modelling deviations from the Hubble flow. Numerous methods have been developed to reconstruct the density and velocity fields at $z \lesssim 0.05$, typically constrained by redshift-space galaxy positions or by direct distance tracers such as the Tully–Fisher relation, the Fundamental Plane, or Type Ia supernovae. We introduce a validation framework to evaluate the accuracy of these reconstructions

Abstract by Richard Stiskalek; Harry Desmond; Julien Devriendt; Adrianne D. Slyz; Guilhem Lavaux; Michael James Hudson; Deaglan J. Bartlett; Hélène M. Courtois, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2025) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1093/mnras/staf1960