Target Size Manipulations Affect Error-Processing Duration and Success Perceptions but not Behavioural Indices of Learning
Nicole T. Ong; Jamie Hawke; Nicola J. Hodges · 2019 · Brain Sciences
WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate
The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.
Abstract
We evaluated if and how success perceptions, through target size manipulations, impact processes related to motor learning. This work was based on recent literature suggesting that expectations and self-efficacy exert a direct impact on learning. We measured arousal, kinematics, learner expectancies, motivation, and outcomes in a dart-throwing task. Novices (n = 29) were assigned to either a “Large-target” (horizontal target, 10-cm high) or “Small-target” (2-cm high) group for practice (t = 90), and both groups completed 24-h retention tests. The Small-target group took longer to plan and proc
Abstract by Nicole T. Ong; Jamie Hawke; Nicola J. Hodges, Brain Sciences (2019) — licensed CC BY 4.0.
About to run something similar?
Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.
Related failures
Reproducible brain-wide association studies require thousands of individuals
Negative / Null Result ReportDaily Left Prefrontal Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Therapy for Major Depressive Disorder
Negative / Null Result ReportEarly Brain Overgrowth in Autism Associated With an Increase in Cortical Surface Area Before Age 2 Years
Negative / Null Result ReportObjective evaluation of anosmia and ageusia in COVID‐19 patients: Single‐center experience on 72 cases
Negative / Null Result ReportPolarity and timing-dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in explicit motor learning
Negative / Null Result ReportThe feedback-related negativity (FRN) revisited: New insights into the localization, meaning and network organization
WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.
Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.3390/brainsci9050119