Understanding the differential impact of outcome monitoring: Therapist variables that moderate feedback effects in a randomized clinical trial
Kim de Jong; Patricia van Sluis; Annet Nugter; Willem J. Heiser; Philip Spinhoven · 2012 · Psychotherapy Research
WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate
The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.
Abstract (excerpt)
Providing outcome monitoring feedback to therapists seems to be a promising approach to improve outcomes in clinical practice. This study aims to examine the effect of feedback and investigate whether it is moderated by therapist…
Excerpt shown for reference under fair use — read the full paper at the publisher.
Hosted by the publisher — may require access.
About to run something similar?
Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.
Related failures
iTUG, a Sensitive and Reliable Measure of Mobility
Negative / Null Result ReportWhat do Workplace Wellness Programs do? Evidence from the Illinois Workplace Wellness Study*
Negative / Null Result ReportHealth Literacy and Older Adults
Negative / Null Result ReportBiases in electronic health record data due to processes within the healthcare system: retrospective observational study
Negative / Null Result ReportInterventions to Prevent Falls in Community-Dwelling Older Adults
Negative / Null Result ReportThe Long-Term Effect of Premier Pay for Performance on Patient Outcomes
WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.
Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1080/10503307.2012.673023