e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessEarth and Planetary Sciences· cited by 325

Comparative performance of the BGISEQ-500 vs Illumina HiSeq2500 sequencing platforms for palaeogenomic sequencing

Sarah S. T. Mak; Shyam Gopalakrishnan; Christian Carøe; Chunyu Geng; Shanlin Liu; Mikkel‐Holger S. Sinding; Lukas F. K. Kuderna; Wenwei Zhang · 2017 · GigaScience

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

Abstract

Ancient DNA research has been revolutionized following development of next-generation sequencing platforms. Although a number of such platforms have been applied to ancient DNA samples, the Illumina series are the dominant choice today, mainly because of high production capacities and short read production. Recently a potentially attractive alternative platform for palaeogenomic data generation has been developed, the BGISEQ-500, whose sequence output are comparable with the Illumina series. In this study, we modified the standard BGISEQ-500 library preparation specifically for use on degraded

Abstract by Sarah S. T. Mak; Shyam Gopalakrishnan; Christian Carøe; Chunyu Geng; Shanlin Liu; Mikkel‐Holger S. Sinding; Lukas F. K. Kuderna; Wenwei Zhang, GigaScience (2017) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1093/gigascience/gix049