e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessEnvironmental Science· cited by 13

Resolving a heated debate: The utility of prescribed burning as a management tool for biodiversity on lowland heath

Barbara Smith; Dan Carpenter; J. M. Holland; Felicity Andruszko; Alfred Gathorne‐Hardy; Paul Eggleton · 2023 · Journal of Applied Ecology

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

Abstract

Abstract Lowland heath is a priority habitat for conservation, nowadays largely managed for biodiversity. Historically, prescribed burning has been the principal management tool, but there are increasing calls to substitute burning with cutting to improve biodiversity outcomes. However, poor understanding of potential impacts compromises decision making. Our study was carried out in the New Forest National Park, the largest area of lowland heath in Europe. Using a multi‐trophic approach, we compared the ecological impact of prescribed burning with two types of vegetation cutting (swiping and b

Abstract by Barbara Smith; Dan Carpenter; J. M. Holland; Felicity Andruszko; Alfred Gathorne‐Hardy; Paul Eggleton, Journal of Applied Ecology (2023) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.14471