e-ISSN: Pending
Failed Experiment ReportOpen accessPhysics and Astronomy· cited by 11

Physics basis for the reference flat-top plasma scenario in the ST–E1 fusion power plant

Steven McNamara; S. Abouelazayem; А. И. Алиева; Michail Savvas Anastopoulos Tzanis; J.W. Berkery; A. Yu. Dnestrovskij; A V Dudkovskaia; F. Janky · 2026 · Nuclear Fusion

WASTE classifies this as Failed Experiment Report · AI classification, approximate

An experimental approach did not work as intended — learn what to avoid before investing the same effort.

Abstract

Abstract As part of the U.S. Department of Energy’s Milestone-Based Fusion Energy Development Program, Tokamak Energy has completed the pre-concept design of the ST–E1 fusion power plant. ST–E1 is envisaged to operate in two phases: a pilot plant phase, targeting sustained net power production of 300 − 500 MWe for a duration > 1 hr , followed by a commercial power plant phase targeting steady-state operations and a normalised overnight capital cost of ⩽ 12 000 $ / kWe . The design process adopted was highly iterative, integrating all major plant systems and progressing i

Abstract by Steven McNamara; S. Abouelazayem; А. И. Алиева; Michail Savvas Anastopoulos Tzanis; J.W. Berkery; A. Yu. Dnestrovskij; A V Dudkovskaia; F. Janky, Nuclear Fusion (2026) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1088/1741-4326/ae5f33