The Continuous Fragility Index of Statistically Significant Findings in Randomized Controlled Trials That Compare Interventions for Anterior Shoulder Instability
Mohammed Al-Asadi; Michelle Sherren; Hassaan Abdel Khalik; Timothy Leroux; Olufemi R. Ayeni; Kim Madden; Moin Khan · 2024 · The American Journal of Sports Medicine
WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate
The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.
Abstract (excerpt)
Background: Evidence-based care relies on robust research. The fragility index (FI) is used to assess the robustness of statistically significant findings in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). While the traditional FI is limited to…
Excerpt shown for reference under fair use — read the full paper at the publisher.
Hosted by the publisher — may require access.
About to run something similar?
Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.
Related failures
t-Test at the Probe Level: An Alternative Method to Identify Statistically Significant Genes for Microarray Data
Negative / Null Result ReportMeteorological Causes of the Secular Variations in Observed Extreme Precipitation Events for the Conterminous United States
Negative / Null Result ReportThe Next Generation of Sepsis Clinical Trial Designs
Negative / Null Result ReportAnalysis of DNA Methylation in Young People: Limited Evidence for an Association Between Victimization Stress and Epigenetic Variation in Blood
Negative / Null Result ReportStudy preregistration: an early example and analysis.
Negative / Null Result ReportInsights Into LSTM Fully Convolutional Networks for Time Series Classification
WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.
Metadata source: Crossref · DOI 10.1177/03635465231202522