ICU nutrition research: did the evidence get better? Remaining sources of bias.
Koretz RL · 2025 · Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care
WASTE classifies this as Methods Dead-End · AI classification, approximate
A method or design hit a limitation — check whether the same constraint applies to your setup.
Abstract (excerpt)
Purpose of review To assess the quality of recently published (18 months from date of article request) randomized trials/systematic reviews of such trials that addressed the use of nutritional support in critically ill patients. Recent…
Excerpt shown for reference under fair use — read the full paper at the publisher.
Hosted by the publisher — may require access.
About to run something similar?
Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.
Related failures
A Randomized Trial of Intraarterial Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Negative / Null Result ReportDuodenal Infusion of Donor Feces for Recurrent Clostridium difficile
Negative / Null Result ReportStenting versus Endarterectomy for Treatment of Carotid-Artery Stenosis
Negative / Null Result ReportEffects of Combination Lipid Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Replication FailureA Randomized Trial of Bevacizumab for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma
Negative / Null Result ReportSpironolactone for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.
Metadata source: Europe PMC · DOI 10.1097/mco.0000000000001080