e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessMedicine· cited by 53

The significant effect of the choice of ionic current integration method in cardiac electro‐physiological simulations

Pras Pathmanathan; Gary R. Mirams; James Southern; Jonathan Whiteley · 2011 · International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

Abstract

Abstract Finite element (FE) cardiac electro‐physiology solvers commonly have ionic current determined at mesh nodes but required element interiors. We consider two interpolation approaches: (i) ionic current interpolation (ICI), where nodal ionic currents are linearly interpolated into the element and (ii) state variable interpolation (SVI), where cell model state variables are interpolated instead, from which the ionic current is evaluated. We explain why SVI leads to a method which is massively more computationally demanding than ICI (more than might originally be expected), and then demons

Abstract by Pras Pathmanathan; Gary R. Mirams; James Southern; Jonathan Whiteley, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering (2011) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1002/cnm.1438