e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessEnvironmental Science· cited by 76

Selecting the optimal method to calculate daily global reference potential evaporation from CFSR reanalysis data for application in a hydrological model study

Frederiek Sperna Weiland; Clément Tisseuil; Hans H. Dürr; Mathieu Vrac; Rens van Beek · 2012 · Hydrology and earth system sciences

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

Abstract

Abstract. Potential evaporation (PET) is one of the main inputs of hydrological models. Yet, there is limited consensus on which PET equation is most applicable in hydrological climate impact assessments. In this study six different methods to derive global scale reference PET daily time series from Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) data are compared: Penman-Monteith, Priestley-Taylor and original and re-calibrated versions of the Hargreaves and Blaney-Criddle method. The calculated PET time series are (1) evaluated against global monthly Penman-Monteith PET time series calculated from

Abstract by Frederiek Sperna Weiland; Clément Tisseuil; Hans H. Dürr; Mathieu Vrac; Rens van Beek, Hydrology and earth system sciences (2012) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.5194/hess-16-983-2012