e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessMedicine· cited by 40

Switching HIV Treatment in Adults Based on CD4 Count Versus Viral Load Monitoring: A Randomized, Non-Inferiority Trial in Thailand

Gonzague Jourdain; Sophie Le Cœur; Nicole Ngo‐Giang‐Huong; Patrinee Traisathit; Tim R. Cressey; Federica Fregonese; Baptiste Leurent; Intira Jeannie Collins · 2013 · PLoS Medicine

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Viral load (VL) is recommended for monitoring the response to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) but is not routinely available in most low- and middle-income countries. The purpose of the study was to determine whether a CD4-based monitoring and switching strategy would provide a similar clinical outcome compared to the standard VL-based strategy in Thailand. METHODS AND FINDINGS: The Programs for HIV Prevention and Treatment (PHPT-3) non-inferiority randomized clinical trial compared a treatment switching strategy based on CD4-only (CD4) monitoring versus viral-load (VL

Abstract by Gonzague Jourdain; Sophie Le Cœur; Nicole Ngo‐Giang‐Huong; Patrinee Traisathit; Tim R. Cressey; Federica Fregonese; Baptiste Leurent; Intira Jeannie Collins, PLoS Medicine (2013) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001494