e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessEnvironmental Science· cited by 18

A global assessment of BirdNET performance: Differences among continents, biomes, and species

David Funosas; Esther Sebastián‐González; Jon Morant; Oscar Humberto Marín‐Gómez; Irene Mendoza; Miguel A. Mohedano-Muñoz; Eduardo Santamaría-García; Giulia Bastianelli · 2026 · Ecological Indicators

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

Abstract

Abstract Recent advances in machine learning have accelerated automated species detection across diverse ecological domains, enabling large-scale, non-invasive monitoring of biodiversity. In ornithological research, coupling passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) with rapidly-developing novel identification tools such as BirdNET—a deep learning–based sound recognition algorithm—offers new opportunities for surveying vocally active bird communities. Yet, BirdNET performance across diverse ecological and biogeographic contexts remains to be quantified. Here, we present the first worldwide evaluation

Abstract by David Funosas; Esther Sebastián‐González; Jon Morant; Oscar Humberto Marín‐Gómez; Irene Mendoza; Miguel A. Mohedano-Muñoz; Eduardo Santamaría-García; Giulia Bastianelli, Ecological Indicators (2026) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.114550