Holding vs Continuing GLP-1/GIP Agonists Before Upper Endoscopy
Akram I. Ahmad; Samita Garg; Jeffrey Jacobs; Zaid Ansari; Tasneem Jamal Al-Din; Ashraf Ali Ahmad Almomani; Sara Osorio Valencia; John J. Vargo · 2026 · JAMA Internal Medicine
WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate
The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.
Abstract
Importance: Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) are known to increase the risk of retained gastric contents. High-quality data are lacking to guide periprocedure management of GLP-1 and GIP agonists. Objective: To compare the risk of clinically significant residual gastric volume (RGV) in patients who continue vs hold 1 dose of weekly or daily GLP-1 and GIP agonists prior to sedation. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized, single-masked clinical trial conducted at 2 large tertiary referral centers in the US included patients under
Abstract by Akram I. Ahmad; Samita Garg; Jeffrey Jacobs; Zaid Ansari; Tasneem Jamal Al-Din; Ashraf Ali Ahmad Almomani; Sara Osorio Valencia; John J. Vargo, JAMA Internal Medicine (2026) — licensed CC BY 4.0.
About to run something similar?
Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.
Related failures
A Randomized Trial of Intraarterial Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Negative / Null Result ReportDuodenal Infusion of Donor Feces for Recurrent Clostridium difficile
Negative / Null Result ReportStenting versus Endarterectomy for Treatment of Carotid-Artery Stenosis
Negative / Null Result ReportEffects of Combination Lipid Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Replication FailureA Randomized Trial of Bevacizumab for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma
Negative / Null Result ReportSpironolactone for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.
Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2026.0027
